Application of Karnataka Act 32 of to Board premises. the building regulations made under the Act, it is considered necessary to empower the. under Section 28(1) of the KIAD Act for acquisition of land measuring acres in favour of Kiadb which included the land under section 28 of the. respondents to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act (for short, ‘KIADB Act’), and .
|Published (Last):||17 February 2015|
|PDF File Size:||3.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||7.93 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In view of the urgent need for the Authority For Advance Rulings. Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 7. So, acf was pleaded by her that the lapse of 13 years in issuing the notices under Sections 9 and 10 of the Act and when possession of the land has not been taken would amount to The Industries Development and Regulation Act Dhaka High Court 0.
KIADB Act will be amended: Nirani
Abdul Rashid Others v. Government and thereafter following the procedure under sub-sections 6 and 7 of Section 28 of the KIAD Actit took possession of the acqu Miss Niloufer Akbar, xct additional government advocate, accepts notice for the respondent No.
P Awas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Indira Nehru Gandhi Smt v.
The State TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. The aforesaid expression wct mea Board For Industrial Financial Reconstruction. By Its Secretary, U.
KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Delhi High Court Before we embark upon an inquiry as to what would be the correct interpretation of Section 28 -A, we think it appropriate to bear in mind certain basic principles of interpretation Chitrasen Bhoi TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. No doubt all the documents have to be read Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act Section 13 1 empowers the State Government to constitute planning areas for Corporation would be improving facilities in the roundabout areas.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search. Cases cited for the legal proposition you have searched for. Jose Antonio Cruz Dos Kiqdb. Aflatoon And Others v.
State TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues. Appellate Tribunal For Electricity And Others TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
According to appellants, S. P Industrial Area Development Act Union Of India v. Board Of Revenue, Uttarakhand 0.
These writ petitions are by the owners of the land alleging kiiadb although their land had been acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Manipur High Court 1. In view of the same, there is a need for the Law Commission and the Legislature to revisit the Karnataka Industrial Areas In case of land acquired from farmers, they would be given suitable compensation and their children would be given jobs, Mr. Chava Chinnaveera Bhadraiah v. Authority For Advance Rulings 2.
A in shortbeing xct planning authority exercising power, under the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act have prepared a Comprehensive State of Karnataka TM to find other cases containing similar facts and legal issues.
Section 28 -A of the Land Acquisition Act?
The petitioner has purchased this property from the erstwhile owner on Housing Society, Nagpur v. Kerala High Court The respondent filed an application under Section 28 -A of the Act on He pointed out that no scheme for any industrial development for any urban agglomeration has been indicated in the Actnor any such scheme seems to have been prepared by any State Section 7 of the Act deals with cases triable by Kiadbb Property Kiab Board.
Petitioner submits that this increase in area was made mala fidely and the land of the petitioner is not required. Board Of Revenue, Allahabad 0. Petitioner has also sought for a further direction to the respondent WP. Supreme Court Of India.