Many of the themes explored in this book can profitably be summed up under the heading of the primacy of the practical in the understanding of. April Pages – Friedrich Schleiermacher: Between Enlightenment and Romanticism – By Richard Crouter. Authors. Clive Marsh. Friedrich Schleiermacher’s groundbreaking work in theology and philosophy was forged in the cultural ferment of Berlin at the convergence of.
|Published (Last):||28 May 2013|
|PDF File Size:||10.1 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||13.32 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Friedrich Schleiermacher: Between Enlightenment and Romanticism : Richard Crouter :
rojanticism Hegel and Schleiermacher in Berlin: Worth mentioning in this context are also a number of more general efforts to erase the very notion of a non-negotiable opposition between enlightenment and romantic philosophy Charles Larmore, Richard Eldridge, Frederick Beiser, and others. This collection should be required reading for anyone- specialist or passing acquaintance.
Gadamer’s critique did in many ways set the course for the philosophical reception of Schleiermacher’s work.
Sign In Forgot password? To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Schleiermacher’s Letters on the Occasion and the crisis of Berlin Jewry; 6. Again it seems to me that a critical rehearsal of Schleiermacher’s theory of language would fit in really well with the ambition to resituate his work in the space between enlightenment and romanticism — but that Crouter, from a philosophical point of view, does not redeem what he promises.
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Reflecting the aesthetic orientations of the Athenaeum circle, his is not an ontological but a literary theory of interpretation — and, as such, it proves particularly fit to deal with the hermeneutic challenges posed by post-romantic, and perhaps even modernist, art and poetry.
Friedrich Schleiermacher: Between Enlightenment and Romanticism by Richard Crouter
Whalen, Queens University, German Studies Review “This collection testifies to the power of elegant and seminal essays. Sign In or Create an Account. At this point, a more plausible course of argument possibly also one that would be more in line with Crouter’s overall project would be to emphasize the contrast between, on the one hand, Schleiermacher’s and Dilthey’s theories of philological-historical reconstruction, and, on the other, the young Heidegger’s call for a phenomenological destruction of tradition in, say, the Augustine lectures of or the Aristotle seminar that he was teaching in Freiburg some short eighteen months later.
Drawing not only on Kierkegaard’s scattered references to Schleiermacher, but also on his philosophical style, Crouter plausibly argues that there is much more of an affinity between the two thinkers than commonly acknowledged.
Friedrich Schleiermacher: Between Enlightenment and Romanticism
The three sections of this book include illuminating sketches of Schleiermacher’s relationship to contemporaries, his work as a public theologian, as well as the formation and impact of his two most Friedrich Schleiermacher’s groundbreaking work in theology and philosophy was forged in the cultural ferment of Berlin at the convergence of the Enlightenment and Romanticism.
Paul added it Aug 01, Other editions – View all Friedrich Schleiermacher: BookDB marked it as to-read Nov 10, Visit our Beautiful Books page and find lovely books for kids, photography lovers and more.
Between Enlightenment and Romanticism by Schlejermacher Crouter. Revisiting Dilthey on Schleiermacher and biography. Heidegger, to be sure, read Schleiermacher in his early period. Lamm, Theological Studies “[Richard Crouter] is blessed with a gift for clear, elegant prose. Schleiermacher, Mendelssohn and Enlightenment theology: Inna marked it as to-read Jan 22, This truly is a puzzling proposal.
How, then, does Richard Crouter situate himself within this landscape? Tim Clancy – – Philosophy in Review No trivia or quizzes yet. You do not currently have access to this article. This picture is reinforced more than a century later in Hans-Georg Gadamer’s influential critique of Schleiermacher in Truth and Method Sign in via friedricu Institution Sign in. Close mobile search navigation Article navigation.
Yet he also addresses questions of a more general, philosophical importance such as the hermeneutic rationale of Dilthey’s reading of Schleiermacher, the Hegel-Schleiermacher debate, Kierkegaard’s indebtedness to Schleiermacher, and Schleiermacher’s theory of language.
On Gadamer’s reading, Schleiermacher’s philosophy, and in particular his theory of interpretation, emerges as little but a subjectivist intermezzo in the long-spanning tradition of hermeneutics.
And if this, given Crouter’s theological orientation, is a text that does not answer the most important frievrich a philosopher may be prone to raise with regard to Schleiermacher’s work, it should still be seen as an important call for more philosophically geared studies of this so often underrated 19 th century philosopher.
If you originally registered with a username please use that to sign in. Schleiermacher’s influence, however, extended beyond the field of theology: